COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
APPEALS COURT
_______________________________________________________________________
NOTICE OF APPEAL
CIVIL
APPEAL NO._______________________
LOWER COURT CONSOLIDATED CIVIL ACTION DOCKET
NO. SUCV 2012-4516 - A
________________________________________________________________________
OGECHI EKE
Petitioner/Defendant (Pro se)
and
PHILLIP OFUME (LIMPT,
INC. -
EDUCATION AND WORK FORCE PROJECT)
Intervenors /Child Civil Rights Advocate
v.
MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
(DCF)
Respondent/Plaintiff
________________________________________________________________
VERIFIED EMERGENCY PETITION FOR REVIEW AND
REQUEST FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF INCLUDING EQUITABLE RELIEF (M.C.P.R. 1)
TO SINGLE JUDGE PURSUANT TO M.G.L C. 211, SEC. 3. MASS R.C.P., SJC RULE 2:01 ET SEQ AND
OPERATING STANDING ORDERS
__________________________________________________________________________________
A. PURPOSE OF PETITION AND
REASON RELIEF SHOULD BE GRANTED BECAUSE OF THE INTEREST OF THE SUBJECT CHILD
AND BIOLOGICAL MOTHER
1. In support of the fact of
this Petition for Review, from the list of exhibits below and in accordance
with Documents Reduction Act, Petitioner and Intervenors attach the following
material evidence, EXHIBIT C.1. (DECISION OF THE SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE,
12/24/2012); EXHIBIT A, (MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed with the Juvenile
Court below); EXHIBIT B (MOTION TO SUBMIT WITNESS AND EXHIBIT filed with Juvenile Court before the final trial on October 9, 2012);
EXHIBIT C (JUDGMENT OF JUVENILE COURT JUDGE PAUL D. LEWIS dated on March 2,
2011) and Equitable Relief (M.C.P.R. 1), on EXHIBIT C or Order dated March 2,
2011; EXHIBITS E, F, G, H, I, GREAT MOTHER/PARENT IN TESTIMONIES BY SUBJECT
CHILD, EXCELLENT CARE AND PROTECTION BY BIOLOGICAL MOTHER, MS. OGECHI EKE,
SUBJECT CHILD'S EXCELLENT SCHOOL
PERFORMANCE UNDER THE CARE AND PROTECTION OF MS. EKE, ETC.; EXHIBIT D - SERVICE
PLAN, COMPLETION AND EXPERT REPORT - LOCATION OF CARE: Roxbury Comprehensive
Community Health Center - Mental Health Department. Name of Provider: Angela
Bell, Ph.D. LMHC. ; EXHIBIT L(HUNDREDS OF ASSORTED CLOTHES OF THE SUBJECT CHILD
PURCHASED BY MS. EKE) AND EXHIBIT M (ASSORTED SHOES AND CLOTHES PURCHASED BY MS.
EKE); 93A DEMAND LETTER TO MASS COLLEGE OF PHARMACY; Proof of strong academic
and professional achievement (graduate of Nigerian University of Agriculture,
5th year student of Mass. College of Pharmacy, etc.); EXHIBITS P & Q (MOTION FOR SHORT ORDER ON NOTICE AND
COMPLAINT filed with the Suffolk Superior Court); ETC.
2. The Hon. Justice Lewis refused to write
written Decision after the final hearing on October 9, 2012 in which for no
just reason after receipt of the information that the subject child is abused
and the subject child confessed that her foster parents use her for slave/child
labor in which they pay her $2.00 per day and as result her education which was excellent with
several academic awards when she was in the care and protection of her Mother
or Ms. Eke is totally doomed. When the
subject child was under the care and protection of Ms. Eke at the age of 4-5
years she was able to read grade 5-8 books and she read same before Judge
Lewis. Learned people including Intervenors, Attorneys and Judges inside and
outside U.S. anonymously said that Judge Lewis refused to return custody of the
subject child on before October 9, 2012 to Ms. Eke because they fear that the
confessions of the child if deepened would tarnish the reputation of the Judge,
DCF, foster parents who are Reverends, etc.
After several letters to Judge Lewis and Clerk of the Boston Juvenile
Court requesting them to issue Judge Lewis' Decision and the request denied,
Petitioner and Intervenors filed Motion for Reconsideration of the Decision of
Judge Lewis dated October 9, 2012 and Petitioner requested hearing before Jury
of Judges. The Clerk of the Court told Petitioner that her case is finished and
that there is no hearing to be set down
and that she should proceed to file appeal.
3. Ms. Eke is an excellent graduate of
the Nigerian University of Agriculture and fifth Year Student of the
Massachusetts College of Pharmacy. At present, she is a single Mother of the
subject child; Ms. Ogechi Eke has personal apartment and personal room; her
female subject child (8years and 3 months) has her own personal room furnished
with bed, wardrode, computer, tables and chairs, book shelf, etc.; Ms. has full time jobs and she works with the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Human services; she is one of the Media/TV Assistant
directors of the largest Gospel Churches in Canton, MA (Fountain of Grace
Church) with additional income. In the foster care home, the subject child has no personal room and the
subject child confessed that the male foster parent (Reverend) sleeps with her
and it severely disgusting because of extreme poverty in the home of the foster
parents which caused the male and female foster parents inability to provide
private and personal room and bed for the subject child that it will be less
disgraceful and disgusting for the subject child to sleep with the female
foster parent without harm done to little subject child.
B.
JURISDICTIONAL BASIS
4.
Because the subject the child is converted to work bull and paid $2.00
per day in place of her education or no after school, weekend , vacation and
other informal and formal teaching and
learning as Ms. Eke has built her daughter to be SMART/TALENTED/GIFTED/A/A+/B+/
won SEVERAL MERIT AWARDS IN MATHEMATICS, READING, WRITING in one of the best
schools in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, the Subject Child has lost almost
the entire educational excellence which Ms. Eke built. At present, in the elementary where the subject child is
placed, the foster parents are not monitoring the performance of the child
because she is mistreated as several other foster by the class
5. This Court has overwhelming jurisdictions,(
personal and subject matter ) to hear and grant Petitioner's Petition for
Review. This type of Petition maybe
filed if any party in the case found
that, there is no genuine issue as to
any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a
matter of law. The subject child is abused in several ways including standing
under eminent danger educationally, economically, psychologically and
ethically. Since 2004 there is no
pending dispute in this case from the disclosure provided by the former Counsel
for the defendant, Ms. Ogechi Eke and Ms. Eke has not been found wanting for
her child and children abuses. In one of the largest Gospel Churches in
Massachusetts, Ms. Eke is the hero and role model for kids in this big church.
Each time she is in the church children are energized with joy and happiness,
they hug her.
6. In several decisions of The Supreme
Court of the United States, Interest of the Child and parents are deeply
considered but the contrary is met in the longstanding damage done to this brilliant child. This case has lasted for seven (7) years
because of the moneyed actions of the Counsel for Ms. Eke who took this case as moneyed
milkpot. From 2004 through June 2012,
the counsel for Ms. Eke kept all papers and other process in this case secret
and the Court supported the action of
Ms. Eke's Counsel thereby violating
5th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution and Bill of Rights of the United States and
the failure of the counsel in staying visitation, investigation and research on
the subject child to the extent of allowing DCF and the foster care providers,
violate US and United Nations Convention and Bill of Rights and Universal
Declaration/Convention on the Rights of the child, parent and family.
7. Counsel for Ms. Eke, Judge Lewis and
DCF are aware that the male adult foster
parent is sleeping with the subject child; used as child laborer to do adult
job in which the 8-year old female subject child is paid peanut or slave wages
of $2.00 per day to make the child forfeit her education. In additionthe
subject tells her moteher-Ms. Eke, that she does care about school anymore,
that her teacher foucs on teaching the other kids in her class while she is
religated to the background and many times, she is used to run errands while
the kids are learning. Subject child is now more intrested in talking about
boyfriends, movies, games. The values of edcuation, christain morals the mother
instilledin the subject child. Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth
Amendment to the United States Constitution, Title IX of the Education
Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1681–1688 (―Title IX‖),and the Massachusetts Human Rights Act, United States Constitution,
Title IV of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§
2000c–2000c-9 (―Title IV‖) and NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT (2001); Ofumes v. DCF - Hampden County
Juvenile District Court, Holyoke Session, Docket No. CP 11H0011; etc.
8.
The subject Child is doomed educationally which is regarded in the
United States as the Gateway to Better Life (LIMPT, INC. -EDUCATION AND
WORKFORCE PROJECT). For example during
one of the few visitations Ms. Eke was allowed to make, she found a deep cut on the wrist of her child and both caregivers would not allow
the subject child’s mother a minute privacy and as they positioned them directly in a circle
of the subject child, foster caregivers and Ms. Eke, Ms. Eke asked her daughter
what happened to your wrist and swiftly the caregivers bullied her and shut her up and requested her
to leave their home or they will call police on her. She rushed out because
they were trying to fight her and frame
up allegations against her. Ms. Eke reported the injury on the subject’s wrist to the DCF, the judge
and the Court but nothing was done as
to sending further information to the Applicant, Ms. Eke. The injury has deformed
subject child’s hand. Ms. Eke request this Court to cause a direct discovery examination
on: the hand or wrist of her daughter and the reason her level of education has
drastically dropped.
9. Further readings on rights of the
child, parent, family, etc.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 56
and Local Rule 56 of the Mass. R. Civ. P.; .G.L. c. 18 sec. 2
(A)(D); 1st , 4th , 5th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution and Bill of Rights of the United States;
Mass. Sup. Court Rule 9A(b)(5); Mas Juv. Ct. Standing Order 2-07; CHINS, G.L.
c. 119 §§39E-H);
Emergency custody hearing (G.L. c. 119, §24; Convention on
the Rights of the Child - Parts I & II (General Assembly resolution 44/25
of 20 November 1989; Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the
United States Constitution, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20
U.S.C. §§ 1681–1688 (―Title IX‖),and
the Massachusetts Human Rights Act,
United States Constitution, Title IV of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.
§§ 2000c–2000c-9 (―Title IV‖) and NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT
(2001); Ofumes v. DCF - Hampden County Juvenile District Court, Holyoke
Session, Docket No. CP 11H0011; United Nations Universal Declaration of Human
Rights (Dec. 10, 1948); etc.
C. ISSUE UNDER CONTEST
10. Whether The longstanding
Presiding Hon. Justice Lewis erred when he refused to return Custody to Ms. Eke
he (Judge Lewis) has conculded on before October 9, 2012 that there are no cases
and allegations of Child Abuse against Ms. Eke.
11. Whether The longstanding
Presiding Hon. Justice Lewis erred when he reversed his March 2, 2011 Decision
that Custody should remain with Ms. Eke; without reason reversed because Ms. Eke and her daughter
("Subject Child") were traveling to Nigeria to attend their relations
burial. Other information filed with the Court below is incorporated with this
Petition and marked EXHIBITS D & P.
12. Whether the action of Judge
Lewis will not be regarded as judicial oversight when Judge Lewis ordered
seizure of the Subject Child because they were traveling to Nigeria whereas in
Judge Lewis' March 2, 2011 Decision there was no travel restriction placed on
Ms. Eke and the Subject Child.
D. OTHER
PERTINENT FACTS FOR REVIEW
13. On before 2004 Ms.
Ogechi Eke, mother of the subject Child, J. George was a Pharmacy Student at
the Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and because of her Nigerian ethnic place
of origin some opponents inside and outside the college unleashed highhanded
persecution and controlled the academic body in nature of coalition including
unfounded allegation of insanity against Ms. Eke and alert sent to the
Department of Social Services or Department of Children and Families. When the
persecution reached life-threatening level Ms. Eke petitioned the college and
the academic staff to the Civil Rights Commission and The Governor of
Massachusetts. Receipt of the papers of the investigation angered the
Massachusetts College of pharmacy and the Department of Social Services or
Department of Children and Families. Action taken under 1st and 5th Amendments
to the Constitution and Bill of Rights of the United States was construed as
MENTAL HEALTH issue and swiftly Ms. Eke was expelled from the Massachusetts
College of Pharmacy without assessment and evaluation of the allegation by
mental health physician or expert. Irately the trump up allegation of mental
health was widely circulated to block Ms Eke and set future path for further
persecution including seizure of her child and her access to alternative
education, employment, etc.
14. On before October 9, 2012
the Department of Children and Families (DCF) told Judge Lewis that the Massachusetts College of Pharmacy (MCPHS)
told them that Ms. Eke was excluded from the College of Pharmacy because she is
"a mad woman" and Judge Lewis did not ask the DCF to show any
evidence of its allegation. Judge Lewis agreed and Judge Lewis said,
"Madam (Ms. Ogechi Eke) my judgement is that custody remains as it
is." The libelious and slanderous word of mouth claim of
MCPHS started because Ms. Eke reported the politicized and toxic
learning environment at the College to The Massachusetts Civil Rights
Commission.
15. Prior to October 9, 2012, to
dismiss the falsified mental health allegation created by the Massachusetts
College of Pharmacy and reported to DCF to facilitate removal of the subject
child, Ms. Eke attended mental health evaluation. She completed the evaluation
process and expert report written and issued (EXHIBUT D). Location of the Evaluation: Roxbury
Comprehensive Community Health Center - Mental Health Department. Name of
Provider: Angela Bell, Ph.D. LMHC. DCF rejected the expert evaluation work of
Dr, Bell because Dr. Bell is a Black. Rejecting expert mental health evaluation
and assessment because of race, color, political affiliation, religion and
related intolerance is what several courts and Judges in the United States will
oppose.
16. The action of Judge Lewis and
DCF angered Roxbury Comprehensive Community Health Center and Mental Health
Department and the Director of the Center, Ms. Coonie B. Cohen (white). In
further opposition, Ms. Coonie B. Cohen signed the assessment/evaluation report
of Dr. Bell (Black) on November 26, 2012. EXHIBIT D.
17. Because of EXHBIT D which has
complete requirement of an official expert work under conventional mental
health assessment and evaluation acceptable by court and other adjudicating
authority, the presiding Judge sanctioned Motion for reconsideration which
remain pending to this day when Petitioner and her Intervenors proceeded to
this honourable Court and Superior Court
to file this Petition and Complaint.
18. In this case EXHIBIT R is
lenghty because the Attorneys seat on it as money making machine and the DCF
created hundreds of service plans which Ms. Eke attended and after each
attendance DCF will not write report to create duplication to make more money.
On the service plan relating mental health evaluation, DCF and its attorney
were divided thus, enlarge time of this case some of them opposed the provider
because of her color and race and the report Dr. Bell issued was censored by the DCF and Court Investigator. On
September 4, 2012 the Haitian Court Investigator controlled by Judge Lewis received
EXHIBIT D or copies of the mental health report of Dr. Bell and she (Haitian
Court Inspector) promised to give the Report to Judge Lewis and on September 4,
2012 and under the conspiracy between DCF and this Court the purported Court
Investigator censored 100% of the progress made by Ms. Eke including completion
of the SERVICE PLAN.
19. On September 30, 2004 Ms.
Eke gave birth to the Subject Child with pains and complications, the nurses
and physicians abandoned Ms. Eke and the nurses called DCF and the agency came
and seized and removed the subject child. The DCF, hospital, College of
Pharmacy and visiting psychiatric doctor connived to recommend mental health
evaluation. This unverified, tested and related lack of expert research and
investigation created a nickname for Ms. Eke and shamefully restated and cited
by the long retained (2004 through October 9, 2012) Hon. Justice Paul D. Lewis.
The newborn subject child was returned to Ms. Eke.
20. On March 2, 2011 Judge Paul
Lewis ordered that Custody of the Subject Child would continue to remain with
Ms. Eke (the child’s mother) EXHIBIT C.
21. Care and Custody changed by the personal power of the DCF
because Ms. Eke and the subject child planned to travel to Nigeria to attend
the burials of their relatives. In EXHIBIT C Judge Lewis did not order or
impose travel restriction on Ms. Eke and the subject Child.
22. On the day of the
departure, DCF and other conspirators listed above followed Ms. Eke and the
subject child from the Boston Airport to Canada and in Canada Ms. Eke and the
Subject Child were blocked from travelling to Nigeria and they were return to
Boston and in the following days Ms. Eke and subject child were brought to
court before Judge Lewis and without reason the subject child was seized and placed
under the custody of foster parents that make the subject child to suffer
severe acute danger educationally, socially, economically, psychologically,
etc.
E.
ARGUMENT ON INTEREST OF THE CHILD AND PARENT
23. The Presiding
Honourable Justice Paul Lewis found no child abuse allegation and other harms
against Ms. Eke therefore Judge Lewis
jumped the strong directions of The Supreme Court of the United States which
reviewed the entire interest of the child and parent affirming that "the Federal Constitution permits a State to interfere with this right only
to prevent harm or potential harm to the child, it found that §26.10.160(3)
does not require a threshold showing of harm... " and particularly see TROXEL
et vir. v. GRANVILLE (CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON). Swiftly, Justice O’Connor,
joined by The Chief Justice, Justice Ginsburg, and Justice Breyer, concluded
that §26.10.160(3), as applied to Granville and her family, violates her due
process right to make decisions concerning the care, custody, and control of
her daughters. Pp. 5—17. Finally on this point, "Justice Thomas agreed that
this Court’s recognition of a fundamental right of parents to direct their
children’s upbringing resolves this case,..
24. EXHIBITS A & B of
EXHIBIT A above and in house Ms. Eke's personal learning resourses EXHIBITS J. George’s Books and other
educational enrichment materials for Home School (Core curriculum Only)
Learning Coach is Mom (Ogechi Eke) and at the early age of 3-5 years the
subject child read grades 5-8 books while under the care of Ms. Eke the subject
child read these high grade books in the presence of Judge Lewis and also the
Department of Education evaluated her educational excellence and promised to
jump her promotion to grade 2 or 3.
25. Now the subject child’s
education is doomed and the school where she is placed demoted her to about
grade 1 because all the educational enrichment resources, daily after
accelerated teaching created by Ms. Eke is gone. In one of the top ranking
Summer Schools in Mass (fee $5000.00) she earned merit award in English,
Mathematics, Writing, etc.
26. The subject child is
abused and subjected to severe form of child labor and the foster parents pay
her about $2.00 to make her abandon her education because the subject child
show example strained of right to see and touch money by the foster parents and
when the subject child now 8 years was paid $2.00/day for working several hours
.
27. On October 9, 2012 Ms.
Eke moved for immediate and unconditional return of her child but the Judge was
interrupted by the DCF with the mental health rumor created by the
Massachusetts College of Pharmacy but without paper and other evidence. Very
shocking that Judge Lewis compromised his power to request DCF to show proof of
MCPHS' mental treatment, assessment and
evaluation which would override the professional evaluation and assesssment
conducted by an expert Dr. Bell (EXHIBIT D.). DCF and MCPHS did not
show any evidence in support of their mouth running slander and libel.
F.
PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
28. The allegations of
paragraphs 1 through 27 above are
incorporated by reference.
29. Several other foster kids
seized by the DCF and given to guardians or adopted are used as money making
tools without focus on their education and the large sum of money paid by the
DCF to these foster parents are used to build personal empire and soon as these
kids are 18 years the payment ends and in major part the adult kids are
excluded and made destitute because the heavy amount of foster kid benefits
which the foster parents receieve and share with DCF is no longer coming
because the foster kid is or over 18 years. Some of the female kids are
prevented from going to school and given boy friends as path to get them
impregnated to enable the foster parents make unofficial kids whom the foster
parents put into moneymaking machine (child benefits and other social
assistance).
30. Bitterly under the support of the Court below the only
child of Ms. Eke is gradually being drilled to inherit the horrible condition
and lifestyle stated in paragraph 29 above because a beautiful young 8-year old
child who healthy and SMART/TALENTED/GIFTED//A/A+/B+/&SEVERAL MERIT AWARDS
IN MATHEMATICS, READING, WRITING in one of the best schools in the Commonwealth
of Massachusetts aspiring to study science with special interest in Medicine is
being destroyed under the harm supported by a
court and Judge to the extent of allowing this young girl to live in a
terrible and unsafe condition where the male adult foster parent sleeps with
her, use her do slave labor and pay $2.00 per day and tactically bar her from doing her school work to gradually build
her mind to disengagement from school; etc.
31. The foster parents have barred
Ms. Eke from coming to teach her after school with the same teaching
resources which Ms. Eke used to build
her to be SMART/TALENTED/GIFTED
/A/A+/B+/&SEVERAL MERIT AWARDS IN MATHEMATICS, READING, WRITING. The foster
parents barred Ms. Eke from coming with friends or relation of her to Burger
King where they (foster parents) bring the subject child once in rare occasion
to see her mother. Since the intervenors and Ms. Eke took over this case and
conducted indepth research and investigation on reason why the subject child
changed from her beautiful nature to an outlook like child mistreated, the
foster parents changed the venue of the one time right to see her to Burger
King Restaurant or Dunkin Donnut because they don’t want to see the work
station of the subject child in their home.
32.
Ms. Eke obeyed all their restrictions because of the love she maintaines
for her only child. Ms. Eke's Child is
highly intimidated and shut up on disclosure of any information on what she has
been suffering since she was taken into foster care. Several times when Ms. Eke
visited the foster parents to see her only child and as soon as the subject
child hugs her bio-mother, the foster parents drags the subject child away and
separates her from receiving questions and answering them. Ms. Eke was warned
not to ask the subject child questions about her academic progress, health,
happiness, friends, etc.
33. The only child of Ms. Eke is mistreated; used to run in-house profit
making business and she is paid $2.00 per day the subject child confessed and
said,
“Mommy I am paid for taking
care of smaller kids in my foster parent daycare …can I give you some money” Mom
ask, tell me how do you do this work? Subject child said, “each time I come
back from school, I start working and I work to time to sleep”
34. This and several other
anonymous and disclosable information and activities which the intervenors and
Ms. Eke got led to prior October 9, 2012 when Ms. Eke and the Intervenors
demanded subpoena on the subject child and other several witnesses and no
subpoenas were issued and the subject child was not brought to the hearing.
35. Without urgent action
taken by this honorable court, the subject child will suffer more and more
abusive danger educationally, socially, economically, psychologically, etc and
finally drop out of school and irreparable in size that no law will contain.
36. Therefore on the
foregoing, the Petitioner is fully entitled to an Order that the Defendant
return custody of the subject to Ms. Eke. (Child’s biological mother)
WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff asks that this Honorable Court enter a Judgment
against Defendant ordering Defendant to return custody of the subject child to
Ms. Eke because the subject child is being destroyed on daily basis because
education which is GATEWAY TO EVERYTHING is neglected and replaced with child
indentured labor.
C. VERIFICATION
OF PETITION
I, Ms. Ogechi Eke hereby
respectfully verify and submit the above-mentioned documents and that they are
correct to the best of my knowledge and signed and authorize submission under
the pains and penalties of perjury this 6th day of January 9 2013.
Massachusetts Department of
Housing and Community Development c/o The Honorable Secretary of Justice and
Attorney-General of the commonwealth of Massachusetts Attention, Attorney of
Record Gwen A. Werner
Department of Justice
(Litigation) One Ashburton Place
Boston, MA 02108 -1518
Phone: (617) 727-2200
Attorney Kathleen J. Moore
P. O. Box 558
Milton, MA 02186
Attorney
Melaine Capwell
Department
of Children and Families (DCF)
50B Park
Street
Dorchester,
MA 02122
_________________
OGECHI EKE
Contact information and other particulars of the
Respondent:
Massachusetts Department of
Transitional Assistance (DTA) Attorney Gwen Werner
c/o The Honourable Secretary
of Justice and Attorney-General of
the commonwealth of
Massachusetts
Department of Justice
(Litigation)
One Ashburton Place
Boston, MA 02108 -10000518
Phone: (617) 727-2200
INTERVENORS/SUPPORTERS
_____________________
Phillip C. Ofume, Ph.D
LIMPT, INC. & IMUN, INC. PROJECT (EDU., HUMAN RIGHTS, INSURANCE CORP.,
LAW REFORM & LITIGATION PROJECT - INTL. CHAPTER); INTL. COALITION FOR PRO
SE/UNSIGNED LAWYERS & GLOBAL CLASS ACTION PROJECT; INTL. ENDOWMENT FOR
DEMOCRACY, FOSTER/ADOPTIVE/ ORPHANAGE & CIVIL LIBERTIES
Phillip C. Ofume, Ph.D. International Coordinator (Strategic Policy/Practice
of Politics of Unification and Unification Politics), U.S. Coordinator (LIMPT,
INC. (HUMAN RIGHTS, LAW REFORM & LITIGATION PROJECT - INTL. CHAPTER)
Godson Etiebet, Ph.D.
Researcher on Policy/Practice of Good Government
Cynthia H. Taylor, Ph.D.
International Collaboration Developer
Alh. (Dr.) Farruk Mohammad -
Strategic Policy Researcher
Tan Ochollu, D.Lit. -
Expansion Project Developer
Reid MacDonald, Ph.D. -
Strategic Program Developer
Jerome Tesfai, D. Min/Div - Domestic Intervention Strategist
Francois
Bourgeois & Pierre Bushel - International Human Rights Watch and Democracy
AFRICAN
CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS ASSOCIATION (ACHRA);
NETLINK
INTERNATIONAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM (NLICS);
INTERNATIONAL
CAMPAIGN FOR NIGERIAN PEOPLE’S LIBERATION AND
DEMOCRACY(ICN-PLD);
OIL AND
CHEMICAL WATCH INTERNATIONAL (OCWI);
AFRICAN
CANADIAN IMMIGRANT SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION (ACISA);
INTERNATIONAL
NETWORK FOR PEACE AND DEVELOPMENT IN AFRIK (NIPAD).
LIMPT, INC.
(EDUCATION AND WORKFORCE PROJECT ET ALS)
MOVEMENT FOR
EMANCIPATION OF THE NIGER DELTA (MEND)
INTERNATIONAL
MOVEMENT FOR NEW FEDERAL UNION OF NIGERIA (IMUN, INC.)
Contact Information:
LIMPT, INC. & IMUN, INC. PROJECT (EDU., HUMAN RIGHTS, INSURANCE CORP.,
LAW REFORM & LITIGATION PROJECT - INTL. CHAPTER); INTL. COALITION FOR PRO
SE/UNSIGNED LAWYERS & GLOBAL CLASS ACTION PROJECT; INTL. ENDOWMENT FOR
DEMOCRACY, FOSTER/ADOPTIVE/ ORPHANAGE & CIVIL LIBERTIES c/o Dr. Phillip C.
Ofume & Associates
41 Gallivan Blvd
Dorchester, MA 02124 OR P.
O. Box 2416
Lynn, MA 01903
Tel. 857-266-2253/781-479-9027
E-mail: limptintinc@gmail.com or
globalaids_hivcureinteraction@yahoo.co.uk or
humanrights.researchgroup@gmail.com
More from this user
· MEDIA AND HON. SENATOR
ELIZABETH WARREN INVITED TO SUFFOLK COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON DEC. 24, 2012 AT
12.00 NOON COURTROOM #1006 TO SEE HORRIFYING CHILD ABUSE BY DCF
· MASS SECRETARY OF JUSTICE
& ATTORNEY-GENERAL, JUDGES PAUL LEWIS AND ELIZABETH FAHEY, AND MASS DCF
IGNORE ABUSES OF A BLACK 8-YEAR FEMALE SUBJECT CHILD BY AN ANGLICAN CHURCH REV.
FOSTER PARENTS (April 2011 - PRESENT)
· MASS SECRETARY OF JUSTICE
& ATTORNEY-GENERAL, JUDGES PAUL LEWIS AND ELIZABETH FAHEY, AND MASS DCF
IGNORE ABUSES OF A BLACK 8-YEAR FEMALE SUBJECT CHILD BY AN ANGLICAN CHURCH REV.
FOSTER PARENTS (April 2011 - PRESENT)
· President Barack Obama
prays in the mosque
· THE PRESIDING HONOURABLE
JUSTICE ELIZABETH FAHEY OF SUFFOLK COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT FAILED THE TEST OF THE
MASS RULES OF CIVIL
No comments:
Post a Comment